Denmark:
In 2002, problems erupted when Muslim imams called for girls to be circumcised and told followers Islamic law (which fully endorses removal of the clitoris or under shafii law makes it obligatory) was more important than Danish law. Information programs for over a decade have failed to reduce the number of girls ‘circumcised’ (Isherwood 2002). Other problems include Muslims making up 5% of the population but taking 40% of the welfare; Muslims making up the majority of convicted rapists (of usually non-Muslim females!!); Muslims having a higher representation in other crimes; failure to mix with the indigenous population and segregation and failure to assimilate; marriage partners from overseas and often young Danish Muslim girls are promised to Muslim men from overseas; the demand for sharia; the rising hatred of Jews;.....
We all know the list because it’s the SAME throughout the western world irrelevant of where the Muslim immigrants come from, or which western country they enter!
Fortunately the Danes have woken up and started to strictly limit immigration and citizenship. Mosques cannot be built in Copenhagen. (see Oh DENMARK! Thursday, 07 October 2010 18:59 Geoff Dickson this site).
The Danish government PAYS Muslims to LEAVE (Struening 2010).
Nikolai Sennels
The work of Nikolai Sennels has helped the Danes get a perspective on the largely insoluble problem of trying to assimilate Muslims -
I began to say what everybody already knew, but, what nobody either wanted or dared to say: that those who are referred to as foreign criminals, religious extremists, or terrorists in the making and who are the cause of lawless parallel societies (what the conference "Diversity and Safety in the City" was about) are all Muslim.
Others should not be stigmatised when the problem is Muslims. His research showed that the Muslims’ cultural and religious experiences played a central role in their psychological development and criminal behaviour.
He noted differences between Westerners and Muslims re Anger/threat behaviour –considered shameful in the west but accepted or standard in Islam. Our desire to argue calmly and rationally is seen as weakness. While westerners have generally, an internal locus of control, Muslims have
“strict external rules, traditions and laws for human behavior. They have a God that decides their life's course. "Inshallah" follows every statement about future plans; if God wants it to happen. They have powerful Muslim clerics who set the directions for their community every Friday. “
Such a difference results in differences regarding freedom and responsibility. We take responsibility for our life, review our behaviour and change while Muslims demand their rules be complied with and develop a ‘victim’ mentality and lack of remorse. Victims of Islamic violence are seen to deserve it because they ‘provoked’ the Muslim. We believe that given guidance, support and a second chance, people will improve – yet integration of Muslims fails despite vast sums of money spent on it! Instead, Sennels suggests clear boundaries, limits and consequences ie an external locus of control with strict consequences for anti-social behaviour eg - deportation.
Samuel Huntington
Similarly ‘honor’ is central to Muslim culture and any perceived offense is met with terror or threats. The Muslim culture creates fragile, insecure, narcissistic male personalities. (No jokes, humor, irony is possible.....).
He noted that second and third generations often became more alienated from the host society and arrogant and superior. Such Muslim failure to identify with the host is found in surveys across Europe. He notes his findings are close to those of Huntington (The Clash of Civilisations).
If integration just consists of learning the language and finding a job, it is not so difficult. But if integration also includes developing mental habits of equally respecting non-Muslims it is simply impossible for most Muslims. They see themselves as special, will always try to live together, create their own Muslim/Islamic parallel societies, feel separated and have less respect towards non-Muslims. True integration doesn’t have to, necessarily, imply religious conversion. However, for Muslims it certainly presupposes cultural conversion. Clearly, very few Muslims have the will, social freedom and strength of personality to go through such a psychologically demanding process.
Islam’s ‘religion’ is their ‘culture,’ their government and their law so they cannot leave their culture while keeping their religion –ie they need to leave Islam.
Some measures he suggests that may be needed to stop conflict between Muslims and non-Muslims in host countries are
Draconian measures may have to include shutting down Muslim immigration; demanding reform of Islamic organizations and leaders in the West; tightening the thumb screws on integration; becoming less dependent on oil in the Middle East; providing incentives to extremely overpopulated, impoverished countries to have less children; creating an alternative to the UN exclusively for democratic countries; cutting the EU's ability to force European countries to receive more Muslim immigrants and refugees; and perhaps even sending Muslims who proved themselves unable to adjust to our Western secular laws back to their countries of origin.
Keysar Trad: In a way, they (Australians) feel safe because of the quantity of water which surrounds this country, so they feel fortified behind this great body, it gives them a feeling of security. But the reality is, the land belongs to God, not to them, and if those foreigners, whom they fear as migrants are not permitted to enter as migrants, they will come as settlers, in numbers so large that they will not be able to process them, hold them, or stop them. What will they do then?’
He notes the failure of politicians to stop the worsening situation – while the Islamists sit back and watch.
We need to understand that it is not possible to integrate masses of Muslims into our Western societies. We need to understand that our non-confrontational Western ways of handling conflicts make us look weak and vulnerable to Muslim leaders. We need to understand that Muslim culture is much stronger and more determined than our guilt-ridden, self-excusing Western culture. We need to understand that Muslims will only feel at home in a Muslim culture and this is why their religious demands for Islamization of the West will never end.
The moment when a popular Islamic cleric declares a Muslim area as Islamic (such declarations are the tradition of Islam, and are happening all over the world - in China, Thailand, ex-Yugoslavia, Russia, Africa etc.) and orders his followers to attack all non-Islamic authorities entering the area, we will have civil wars. No State can tolerate such an attack on its authority and will have to stop it from happening and stop it from growing. These “no go” self-governing areas are already full of violent criminals, weapons and Islamic extremists. They will probably not give up either their guns or themselves to the authorities voluntarily. Such Islamic declarations have already happened on an unofficial level. All Western European countries have such “no go” areas where policemen and authorities are met with threats and flying stones upon entering; all while Islamic authorities such as Imams and homegrown Sharia courts freely rule these “no go” areas, creating Muslim ghettoes.
After having heard the stories from Muslims themselves about their culture, religion, home countries, Muslim ghettoes, their views on non-Muslims, democracy, women and freedom, I have no hope that we can avoid “blood, sweat and tears” during this conflict. Taj El Din Al Hilaly (left): ‘I have said and continue to affirm that taking up residence in Western migrant society is not permissible for a Muslim unless he has the intention of calling to Allah-Exalted and Elevated.’
It will take many idealistic women and men many years before we reach a point where we can be sure that our freedom-loving culture will win such a conflict. As it stands now, such victory is not at all certain. I hope that many brave people will stand up for what we all believe in, and be mindful of how easily it can be lost. They could write letters to their newspapers, study the Qu’ran and the crime statistics (the only two sources you need to convince yourself that Muslim immigration is a very bad idea). Then they could present their opinions in a confident manner when conversation turns to the subject of Islam and Muslim immigration at lunch, work and at family dinners. A popular movement composed of average citizens standing up against the immature and psychologically unhealthy culture of Islam is the way and the goal. Nothing is more important than that.
AGREE.
Is there hope – Well I think there is. Northern Europe seems to be waking up. And the now free Eastern European states (including Greece) are rediscovering their history and that history is filled with battles against Islam recorded in documents, paintings, statues , murals and friezes on buildings. As my bus driver said, We were slaves of Islam for many, many centuries, now we are FREE! And my feeling is they won’t be slaves again. I loved their freedom, their entrepreneurship, their topless females of all shapes and sizes on the beach without fear of abuse, their cafes, wine with our meal, girls and guys zipping about on quad bikes or enjoying each other’s company, markets, their pride in their history ....... ...NO ISLAM HERE THANKS!
No comments:
Post a Comment